Our client needed to replace mission critical corporate and call centre communications infrastructure, replacing obsolete technology from a bankrupt vendor. Their teams were steeped in old-style telecoms rather than IP, and the project to design and deliver the changes required was troubled. Our client wanted assurance that the project would not cause a customer service debacle and that turnaround actions had been effective.
An expert team was needed to review (1) programme plans; (2) commercial arrangements and risk sharing with vendors and(3); the technical network designs themselves.
We identified the key risks of the programme and what leading practice controls we would expect to be in place. We obtained and independently reviewed key project and design documents. We looked to see what controls and approvals had been applied to the documents, and interviewed key personnel on the project.
Network and CTI designs, covering Avaya ACD, Nice Voice Recording and other voice recognition technology, were analysed against leading practice. We identified a design flaw where a single failure in the contact centre could result in over 20% of its capacity being lost and proposed an effective mitigation.
Generally the turnaround actions had been effective at putting the programme under much improved control. However we identified a track record of ‘new work’ being discovered. This was due to rushed, inaccurate planning in the wake of the turnaround. This had left a legacy of delay and cost risks which, by the time of the review, had mostly been ‘worked out’ of the programme.
We also identified some expedient procurement and commercial decision making that was not in line with good practice. This resulted in vendors enjoying contracts where they did not taking proper risk on their delivery or operational performance. A multimillion pound IT asset was bought and paid for a year in advance, incurring financing costs and wasting a one year warrantee.