• Current state assessment
  • Identification of opportunities to improve inefficient call centres located in expensive locations
  • Transport
  • Cost reduction
  • Geographic labour cost arbitrage in UK
  • Service scope and prioritisation
  • Service automation
  • Constructive challenge

Transport organisation

Identification of major cost saving opportunities

In the post global financial crisis economy, there has been a massive focus on efficiency savings across the public sector. David’s client was one of a number of public bodies under pressure to cut costs. Its call centres were located in London and in the process of implementing a transformation programme designed to shift calls to automated channels, and so increasing productivity. David identified opportunities to reduce operating cost by 50-70%

Management wanted to explore previously barred strategic options such as outsourcing instead of further investment in London operations, allowing faster and deeper cost cuts. David worked with the client’s teams to find a way of producing efficiently baseline data, circulating a questionnaire to facilitate the process. David and his team performed expert analysis of the contact call centre cost base and the results of the ongoing transformation programme. Through a series of meetings and workshops, we developed a common understanding of the cost base. Once the cost analysis was complete, a like-for-like comparison of the existing operating model with an outsourced one was made. We worked in an integrated manner with management and relevant stakeholders, sharing the results of our analysis and co-authoring key findings. Robust and open challenge ensured they were happy with the quality of data, analysis and resulting findings. We helped to facilitate a better understanding amongst stakeholders of the existing investment in transformation and why its costs were higher than benchmarks.

Our work enabled our client to understand initiatives to reduce its cost base by implementing radical changes, demonstrating that outsourcing would half the costs of its operations compared to continuing operations in London. Additionally we showed that moving ‘elective’ services onto low-cost channels or a more ‘hard-nosed’ decision to withdraw non essential services could save an additional 20-25% of cost. Our work provided compelling evidence and impetus for self-funding change.